Volcker’s financial reform?

by Surya on January 21, 2010

Potentially great news being reported today that the Obama administration will present comprehensive proposals for financial reform that are close to what Paul Volcker has been asking for.

At the core of this issue is the need to make sure that “too big to fail” means “too big to exist”. As long as these financial institutions believe that the next time they blow themselves up, that we, the taxpayers, will be there to bail them out because they are “too important”, we’ll continue to have these crises.

We need smaller institutions whose individual failures could be digested by the financial system. Related to this we need to separate the side of the business that essentially takes massive risky trading bets from the part that does traditional banking. In the Fall of 2008 there was serious concern that money wasn’t going to come out of the ATM’s the next day. This is a great first step to ensure that we don’t find ourselves in that terrible position again.

  • http://twitter.com/andyzilch Andy Zilch

    Agree. Banks are in a special class which we cannot live without. You can't group a banking system in with a software company (besides if MS fails, there are alternatives and there are plenty of smaller kinds of companies that would be able to fill the gap for mission critical uses of MSFT's software – there is no way for us to replace the banking… See More system; my investments and savings account go to $0 in an instant and I'm not going to be searching for alternatives, i'm going to be searching for some guns).

    There has to be something to protect us from any one element of the system being too big to fail without taking the whole system down. The trick for me would be to pick the right graduated scale of tax/insurance/whatever we force each element to pay so that they can continue to grow as large as they want, but that size is never so large that the tax/insurance/whatever cannot help us cushion the blow if we have to let them go out of business.

    Maybe that's not completely free market, but it's not completely socialism either.

  • http://www.votechili.com/ Surya Yalamanchili

    Hi Andy – totally agree with everything you wrote. (except the socialism part because i'm not still not quite sure what the heck banking regulation has to do with socialism!)

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: